Showing 1959 results

Archival description
Nassau Senior papers File
Print preview View:

Napier, Edinburgh, to S., [? K.],

Comments on length of article; recognises importance of Ireland but considers that public tired of problem and demand variety from a quarterly review; concerned about whether article truly represents views of the Whigs or merely that of S.; Whig leaders must be consulted over this, especially Russell and Lansdowne, and also Macaulay.

Nassau William Senior, [? K.], to Napier, [Edinburgh],

Re article on Germany, will write article on Lord King. 'Factory labour must be left to [J. S.] Mill. He will be ingenious and original Tho' I now do not quite trust his good sense.' Comments on poor law in Scotland. Copy made by Mrs Strachey.

Russell, Althorp, to S., [? K.],

Re recipient's article on Ireland in Edinburgh Review: 'Mr Napier tells me Lord Monteagle disagrees with some of your positions - But it is impossible to make the work of a single mind suit the various opinions of political men, and all that I desire is that the paper should be considered as the Review, and not the party. There must be, & ought to be a great difference between what appears but in viewing a subject as a whole, & what appears practicable when the cabinet, & the two Houses of Parliament are taken into consideration Indeed I often wonder that any useful measure at all comes out from the grinding process of government distribution, & parliamentary discussion.'. Has told Napier that his review would only be spoilt by trying to combine the expression of various politicians into one crucible'.

Sugden, ?, to S., [? K.],

Re possible appointment of a conveyancer as a Master in Chancery; believes it would be advantageous to the Court; considers 'experiment is worth trying', and 'I, as an individual, shd see with great pleasure your appointment.'. Copy by S.

Results 121 to 140 of 1959